Coin info
Rank
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Circulating Supply
Total Supply
Do you think the price will rise or fall?
Rise 40%
Fall 60%
Price perfomance
Depth of Market
Depth +2%
Depth -2%

PRICE
+9.08%
$0.01132

PRICE
+7%
$0.02893

PRICE
+5.9%
$0.1067

PRICE
+2.8%
$2.53

PRICE
+2.24%
$1.87

PRICE
+1.58%
$1.04

PRICE
+1.13%
$73.27

PRICE
+0.67%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.17%
$10.03

PRICE
+0.17%
$0.07987

PRICE
+0.12%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.06%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.03%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.13

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9999

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0%
$11.04

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

PRICE
+0%
$1.1

VOL24
+30,054.26%
$1.13

VOL24
+516.19%
$0.9992

VOL24
+477.86%
$1.0000

VOL24
+223.21%
$3.14

VOL24
+208.79%
$1.04

VOL24
+159.53%
$0.9997

VOL24
+80.02%
$0.9999
VOL24
+65.26%
$0.007648
VOL24
+57.53%
$583.92

VOL24
+53.09%
$0.02893

VOL24
+51.73%
$0.08156

VOL24
+46.72%
$0.8600

VOL24
+39.47%
$0.9999

VOL24
+31.61%
$51.37

VOL24
+30.63%
$1.32

VOL24
+27.95%
$4,643.58

VOL24
+26.26%
$0.6632

VOL24
+25.65%
$83

VOL24
+24.21%
$2.84

VOL24
+21.16%
$95.09

VOL24
+20.17%
$2.53

VOL24
+18.26%
$0.1705

VOL24
+17.51%
$0.3152

VOL24
+17.16%
$0.2406

VOL24
+16.99%
$79.26
PRICE
+9.08%
$0.01132

PRICE
+7%
$0.02893

PRICE
+5.9%
$0.1067

PRICE
+2.8%
$2.53

PRICE
+2.24%
$1.87

PRICE
+1.58%
$1.04

PRICE
+1.13%
$73.27

PRICE
+0.67%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.17%
$10.03

PRICE
+0.17%
$0.07987

PRICE
+0.12%
$0.052

PRICE
+0.06%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.03%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.13

PRICE
+0.03%
$1.01

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9999

PRICE
+0.02%
$0.9997

PRICE
+0.01%
$1.0000

PRICE
+0%
$11.04

PRICE
+0%
$1

PRICE
+0%
$1.13

PRICE
+0%
$1.1

VOL24
+30,054.26%
$1.13

VOL24
+516.19%
$0.9992

VOL24
+477.86%
$1.0000

VOL24
+223.21%
$3.14

VOL24
+208.79%
$1.04

VOL24
+159.53%
$0.9997

VOL24
+80.02%
$0.9999
VOL24
+65.26%
$0.007648
VOL24
+57.53%
$583.92

VOL24
+53.09%
$0.02893

VOL24
+51.73%
$0.08156

VOL24
+46.72%
$0.8600

VOL24
+39.47%
$0.9999

VOL24
+31.61%
$51.37

VOL24
+30.63%
$1.32

VOL24
+27.95%
$4,643.58

VOL24
+26.26%
$0.6632

VOL24
+25.65%
$83

VOL24
+24.21%
$2.84

VOL24
+21.16%
$95.09

VOL24
+20.17%
$2.53

VOL24
+18.26%
$0.1705

VOL24
+17.51%
$0.3152

VOL24
+17.16%
$0.2406

VOL24
+16.99%
$79.26
Rise 40%
Fall 60%


$0.05574
#507
$44,483,192
$39,913,464
709,984,438.92
1,186,707,049

Rank #699
$0.004485
+1.75%

Rank #1221
$0.1283
+2.28%
![Phoenix Global [OLD]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoin-images.coingecko.com%2Fcoins%2Fimages%2F1074%2Flarge%2Fphoenix-logo.png%3F1696502176&w=3840&q=75)
Rank #1399
$0.002226
+0%
Rank #4143
$0.0005650
-3.24%

Rank #4262
$0.005159
+5%

Rank #5928
$0.0004930
+0%

Rank #15783
$0.001180
+0%

Rank #18565
$0.0004990
+0%

Rank #19164
$0.09512
+0%
Terra 2.0 which will assume the Terra name is a new blockchain launched by Terraform Labs as part of the passing of governance proposal 1623. The Terra protocol is a decentralized and open-source public blockchain protocol. Luna is the Terra protocol’s native staking token used for governance and mining. Users stake Luna to validators who record and verify transactions on the blockchain in exchange for rewards from transaction fees. The Terra 2.0 chain will not have a stablecoin and holders of the old Terra Classic chain will be airdropped new Luna native coins. In the plan, developers of the Terra ecosystem are to migrate and deploy their dapps on the new blockchain.
25 Mar 2026, 02:20

BitcoinWorld Jump Trading Lawsuit: Explosive Allegations Claim Terraform Labs Seeks to Offload SEC Fine In a dramatic legal development shaking the cryptocurrency sector, market maker Jump Trading has fiercely countered a $4 billion fraud lawsuit from Terraform Labs, labeling it a “desperate attempt” to transfer responsibility for massive regulatory penalties. The escalating conflict, filed in United States bankruptcy court, centers on allegations of deception during the catastrophic Terra ecosystem collapse in 2022. This case now represents a pivotal moment for legal accountability in digital asset markets. Jump Trading Lawsuit Details and Core Allegations Todd Snyder, the bankruptcy trustee overseeing Terraform Labs’ proceedings, initiated the substantial lawsuit in December 2024. The complaint targets Jump Trading, its subsidiary Jump Crypto, and several company executives. It specifically alleges they engaged in deceptive practices that misled investors while generating illicit profits during Terra’s destabilization. Consequently, the lawsuit seeks financial restitution for losses suffered by the bankrupt estate’s creditors. Furthermore, the filing details complex trading activities around Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin, UST, and its sister token, LUNA. According to court documents, Jump Trading allegedly used non-public information and market dominance to execute advantageous trades. These actions, the trustee argues, exacerbated the downward spiral that erased approximately $40 billion in market value within days. The case therefore examines the ethical boundaries of market making during systemic crises. Terraform Labs’ SEC Fine and the $4.4 Billion Penalty The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) imposed a historic $4.4 billion fine on Terraform Labs and its co-founder, Do Kwon, in 2024. This penalty resulted from a separate civil case concluding that the company offered unregistered securities and committed fraud. The SEC’s judgment highlighted misleading statements about UST’s stability and the utilization of the Chai payment platform. As a result, Terraform Labs faces immense financial pressure from multiple governmental authorities. Jump Trading’s legal response directly connects the trustee’s lawsuit to this regulatory penalty. The firm contends the legal action represents a strategic effort to “offload” the SEC fine’s financial burden onto another party. Jump’s attorneys argue Terraform Labs seeks alternative sources for penalty payments through litigation. This accusation introduces a complex layer of motive to the already intricate bankruptcy litigation. Legal Defenses and Statute of Limitations Arguments Jump Trading has mounted a robust defense, requesting complete dismissal of the case. The firm’s motion challenges the lawsuit on multiple procedural and substantive grounds. Primarily, Jump asserts the complaint lacks specific details regarding alleged violations, including their precise locations and timelines. This vagueness, they argue, violates basic pleading standards required in federal court. Additionally, Jump Trading invokes the statute of limitations, claiming the alleged activities occurred beyond the permissible filing period. Legal experts note this defense could prove decisive if the court agrees the clock started ticking during the 2022 collapse. The motion also questions the bankruptcy trustee’s legal standing to pursue certain claims originally belonging to individual investors. These technical arguments will likely shape the case’s preliminary phases. Broader Context: Jane Street Lawsuit and Market Maker Scrutiny Todd Snyder has simultaneously pursued legal action against another major market maker, Jane Street Group. That separate lawsuit alleges similar misconduct during the Terra collapse, suggesting a pattern of behavior across proprietary trading firms. Together, these cases indicate bankruptcy trustees are aggressively investigating all entities that profited from the ecosystem’s failure. This approach aims to maximize creditor recoveries through every available legal channel. The parallel litigation highlights increased regulatory and legal scrutiny of cryptocurrency market makers’ roles. These firms provide essential liquidity but operate with limited transparency compared to traditional finance counterparts. Consequently, the Terra collapse has prompted examinations of their influence during market crises. Regulatory bodies worldwide are now evaluating whether existing frameworks adequately govern these activities. Impact on Crypto Regulation and Industry Practices This lawsuit arrives during a transformative period for digital asset regulation. The SEC’s substantial fine against Terraform Labs demonstrated renewed enforcement vigor. Now, the Jump Trading case tests how civil courts handle complex crypto fraud allegations between private entities. The outcome could establish important precedents for liability standards during decentralized finance (DeFi) failures. Industry analysts observe that market makers have already adjusted their operational practices. Many firms enhanced compliance programs and implemented stricter internal controls. They also increased disclosure regarding their trading relationships with blockchain projects. These changes reflect broader industry maturation following several high-profile catastrophes. However, legal uncertainties persist about duties owed to third parties during market disruptions. Historical Timeline: From Terra Collapse to Current Litigation The legal confrontation stems directly from events beginning in May 2022. Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin, UST, lost its dollar peg, triggering a death spiral for the entire ecosystem. Within one week, UST and LUNA’s combined market capitalization evaporated. This collapse erased billions in investor wealth and precipitated bankruptcies across interconnected crypto ventures. Subsequently, multiple governmental investigations commenced in South Korea, the United States, and Singapore. These probes focused on Terraform Labs’ representations and the conduct of major counterparties. The SEC filed its enforcement action in February 2023, culminating in the 2024 penalty. Meanwhile, the bankruptcy court appointed Todd Snyder as trustee to marshal assets for creditor distribution. His litigation strategy now targets entities he believes contributed to or exploited the collapse. Key Events Chronology: May 2022: Terra UST depegging event and ecosystem collapse July 2022: Terraform Labs files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection February 2023: SEC files fraud charges against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon December 2024: Bankruptcy trustee files $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading January 2025: Jump Trading moves to dismiss, citing SEC fine offloading attempt Ongoing: Parallel proceedings against Jane Street and other entities Conclusion The Jump Trading lawsuit represents a critical juncture for post-collapse accountability in the cryptocurrency industry. Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy trustee alleges substantial fraud, while the defendant frames the action as a desperate financial maneuver. This legal battle will clarify responsibilities for market makers during systemic failures. Moreover, it intersects with broader regulatory actions, including the massive SEC fine. The court’s eventual ruling will influence how future DeFi catastrophes are litigated and may reshape industry practices for years. Consequently, all participants in digital asset markets are monitoring this Jump Trading lawsuit closely for its substantial implications. FAQs Q1: What is the core allegation in the Terraform Labs lawsuit against Jump Trading? The bankruptcy trustee alleges Jump Trading deceived investors and gained illicit profits through advanced knowledge and trading activities during the Terra collapse in May 2022. Q2: Why does Jump Trading claim the lawsuit is an “offloading” attempt? Jump Trading contends the lawsuit seeks to transfer financial responsibility for Terraform Labs’ $4.4 billion SEC fine onto Jump, calling it a desperate move to find funds for the penalty. Q3: What is the significance of the statute of limitations defense? Jump Trading argues the alleged misconduct occurred beyond the legal time limit for filing such claims, which could result in dismissal if the court agrees the clock started in 2022. Q4: How does the Jane Street lawsuit relate to this case? The same bankruptcy trustee filed a similar lawsuit against market maker Jane Street, suggesting a coordinated strategy to recover funds from multiple entities that traded during the collapse. Q5: What broader impact might this case have on cryptocurrency regulation? The outcome could set precedents for market maker liability, influence how regulators approach enforcement, and potentially lead to stricter operational standards for liquidity providers in crypto markets. This post Jump Trading Lawsuit: Explosive Allegations Claim Terraform Labs Seeks to Offload SEC Fine first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
21 Mar 2026, 21:30

At its peak, SpaceX sat on roughly 28,000 Bitcoin — a position then valued at around $1.8 billion. Today, that number stands at 8,285 BTC, worth approximately $574 million. The company shed nearly 70% of its original holdings over a two-year stretch that coincided with one of crypto’s worst downturns. A Treasury Quietly Cut Down In August 2023, a Wall Street Journal report based on reviewed financial documents revealed that SpaceX wrote down $373 million in Bitcoin value across 2021 and 2022 and had sold its cryptocurrency holdings, though the extent of the sale was not disclosed. The disclosure sent Bitcoin briefly below $25,000 and triggered over $386 million in futures liquidations. SpaceX , as a private company, was never required to explain the sell-off publicly. The timing, reports noted, tracked closely with the collapse of major crypto firms including Terraform Labs and FTX. BITCOIN COMPANY LAUNCHING SATELLITES SpaceX just launched 29 Starlink satellites – and holds 8,285 BTC ($573.8M). With ~10,000 satellites in orbit and a potential $1.75T IPO, one of the world’s largest companies is bringing Bitcoin onto its balance sheet. Read more below: pic.twitter.com/oUxtDoimee — Arkham (@arkham) March 21, 2026 That reduced stack is now heading into the spotlight. SpaceX is preparing for what could be the largest initial public offering in history — a listing that Bloomberg reported in late February could raise as much as $50 billion and push the company’s valuation to around $1.75 trillion. For context, Saudi Aramco’s 2026 debut raised $29 billion. A SpaceX listing would blow past that figure. What The IPO Changes At a $1.75 trillion valuation , the $574 million in Bitcoin on SpaceX’s books is a drop in the ocean. But the symbolism carries real weight. Very few of the world’s largest companies hold Bitcoin as a balance sheet asset, and a company of SpaceX’s scale going public with BTC in its books would put that practice in front of a new class of institutional investors. On March 19, SpaceX launched 29 Starlink satellites from Cape Canaveral aboard a Falcon 9 rocket , a routine mission for a company that is now the world’s busiest launch provider. Starlink’s constellation has grown to nearly 10,000 satellites in orbit. Data shows the service had 9.2 million active users globally at the end of 2025, and revenue is projected to hit $24 billion in 2026 — up from $10 billion the year before. That growth is the engine driving SpaceX’s valuation case ahead of the listing. Arkham Intelligence, which tracks on-chain data, places SpaceX 18th among corporate Bitcoin holders worldwide. Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, holds over 761,000 BTC and has set a public target of reaching 1 million coins before year-end 2026. Bitcoin was trading at approximately $70,650 at the time of publication. Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
18 Mar 2026, 17:30

Bitcoin is once again at the center of attention as a fresh wave of on-chain activity brings one of the most closely watched trading firms back into focus. Recent data shows that Jane Street has resumed moving Bitcoin, drawing renewed attention at a time when scrutiny around its past actions has not fully subsided. On-Chain Bitcoin Data Reveals Coordinated Inflows Recent blockchain tracking data highlights a clear resurgence in activity tied to wallets associated with Jane Street. Within roughly two hours, these wallets received a combined 205.36 BTC, valued at approximately $15.08 million at the time. The inflows originated from two major trading platforms, BitMEX and LMAX Digital . The transaction breakdown shows a coordinated pattern. A 150 BTC transfer worth about $11.01 million moved from a BitMEX hot wallet, followed by 55.33 BTC valued at roughly $4.06 million from LMAX Digital. Additional smaller transfers of 0.02 BTC and 0.01 BTC were also recorded from BitMEX-linked wallets. All funds were directed into a single receiving wallet linked to the firm . The timing and clustering of these transactions point to deliberate execution. Movements from exchange hot wallets into a unified address typically reflect institutional positioning, such as liquidity setup or internal rebalancing . The rapid sequence and scale reinforce the view that this was a coordinated operation, signaling that Jane Street is once again actively engaging with the Bitcoin market. Jane Street And The Terra/LUNA Collapse, Allegations The renewed activity comes as Jane Street remains under scrutiny for its alleged role during the Terra/LUNA collapse in May 2022, one of the most significant failures in crypto market history. The Terra ecosystem, developed by Terraform Labs , revolved around two key tokens: UST, an algorithmic stablecoin designed to maintain a $1 peg, and LUNA, which absorbed volatility to support that peg. In early May 2022, large withdrawals from the Anchor Protocol, where UST deposits were earning high yields, began to destabilize the system. As UST fell below $1, increasing amounts of LUNA were minted to stabilize it, which rapidly diluted LUNA’s value. Within days, UST collapsed far below its peg, and LUNA dropped from over $80 to near zero, wiping out tens of billions in market value. Legal filings allege that Jane Street purchased LUNA at a significant discount—around $0.40 per token—before the collapse, with terms allowing favorable conversion or sale. As the market destabilized, it’s claimed the firm sold parts of its holdings while prices were still above acquisition cost, potentially realizing profits of roughly $1 billion. Jane Street denies wrongdoing, asserting that its actions were standard market-making and trading operations, not insider activity . The controversy continues to influence discussions on institutional behavior in crypto markets. Any renewed activity, such as the recent Bitcoin inflows by Jane Street, draws scrutiny from analysts and investors alike, highlighting the market-moving potential of major players.
9 Mar 2026, 01:00

The price of Bitcoin has struggled to muster a sustained upward climb over the last few weeks, with the latest one failing around the $74,000 mark in the past week. However, the premier cryptocurrency seems to have deeper problems than failed price recovery attempts. According to a crypto market expert, the Bitcoin price is at a stage reminiscent of the bearish period of 2022. Is BTC About To Witness A Repeat Of 2022? In a March 8 post on the X platform, Chartered Market Technician Tony Severino shared an interesting insight into the current situation of the Bitcoin market. The crypto pundit hypothesized that the world’s largest cryptocurrency might have to endure a bearish period associated with the Terra (LUNA) ecosystem crash in 2022. The rationale behind this evaluation is the steady decline in the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator on BTC’s two-week price chart. MACD is a prominent momentum indicator used in technical analysis to identify trend direction, momentum changes, and potential entry and exit positions. Typically, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator has two lines: the MACD line (green) and the signal line (red), and a histogram, which reflects the distance between the two aforementioned lines. The histogram, which is the primary momentum indicator, is currently signaling a strong bearish momentum. This observation is because the histogram bars are expanding, signaling rising momentum in the current direction (which is bearish because the bars are below the neutral or zero line). According to Severino, the MACD indicator is even expanding to levels not seen since 2022, when the Terra (LUNA) ecosystem collapse sent bearish shockwaves through the entire crypto market. 2W Bitcoin LMACD momentum is around the same point before the Luna collapse in 2022 It’s possible something nasty is coming How are you managing your risk? And do you even know how? pic.twitter.com/SFzsYJxiZc — Tony Severino, CMT (@TonySeverinoCMT) March 8, 2026 The crypto market analyst said, “it is possible that something nasty is coming,” suggesting that another crypto winter might be imminent. After Terra’s collapse in May, the premier cryptocurrency would have fallen from above $50,000 to around $30,000 — about a 40% decline — by July 2022. However, it is important to note that the market might have already priced in what is currently being seen in the MACD indicator, which is often considered a lagging indicator. Moreover, Bitcoin has already lost nearly 30% of its value so far in 2026. Bitcoin Price At A Glance At the time of this writing, the price of BTC stands at around $67,520, reflecting no significant movement in the past 24 hours.