hodler

2 Apr 2026, 12:43

Ethereum crosses 200 million quarterly transactions for the first time ever

Ethereum ( ETH ) blockchain registered its highest quarterly transactions since inception during the first quarter (Q1) of 2026. Over the past three months, the Ethereum network hit a record of 200.4 million, according to metrics from Artemis , a crypto analytics platform. As such, the chain’s quarterly transactions surged by around 43% from the previous quarter to reach an all-time high (ATH) in Q1. Ethereum quarterly transactions. Source: Artemis Since Ethereum’s quarterly transactions bottomed around Q4 of 2023, the figure has gradually climbed to its peak earlier this year. Specifically, the number of settlements recorded on the Ethereum network peaked at 2.897 million transactions per day on February 7, 2026, before dropping to about 2.363 million payments on April 2, as per data from YCharts , a research and analytics platform. Ethereum transactions per day. Source: YCharts Why did Ethereum quarterly transactions peak in Q1? The primary reason why Ethereum’s transactions skyrocketed in Q1 was the sharp uptick in active addresses. Between January 1 and March 31, the number of active addresses on the Ether chain reached 12.6 million, a gain of about 1,704% from the prior quarter, based on analysis from DeFiLlama. Ether active addresses per quarter. Source: DeFiLlama The active addresses on the Ethereum network surged after prior upgrades, which led to increased organic growth in layer two (L2) networks such as Base and Arbitrum ( ARB ), thereby boosting mainnet usage. Total stablecoins market cap on Ether. Source: DeFiLlama Meanwhile, the number of active users and transactions on the Ethereum ecosystem was bolstered by its rising stablecoin market cap. As of this reporting, the ETH’s stablecoins market cap, per updates from DeFiLlama , was around $164.4 billion, catalyzed by regulatory clarity in the United States through the Genius Act. Higher stablecoin liquidity on-chain generally increases settlement and transfer demand, supporting overall transaction volumes. The post Ethereum crosses 200 million quarterly transactions for the first time ever appeared first on Finbold .

2 Apr 2026, 01:35

HyperEVM Outage Crisis: PeckShield Reports Major Service Disruption on Hyperliquid Network

BitcoinWorld HyperEVM Outage Crisis: PeckShield Reports Major Service Disruption on Hyperliquid Network Blockchain security firm PeckShield has reported a suspected major service outage affecting Hyperliquid’s HyperEVM, potentially disrupting transactions and smart contract operations across the Layer 2 network. This incident, detected through automated monitoring systems, raises critical questions about infrastructure reliability in the rapidly evolving Ethereum scaling ecosystem. The suspected outage comes at a time when Layer 2 solutions are experiencing unprecedented adoption, making network stability paramount for thousands of daily users and decentralized applications. HyperEVM Outage Details and Initial Reports PeckShield’s monitoring systems first detected anomalous activity on the HyperEVM network around 14:30 UTC on March 15, 2025. The security firm subsequently issued a public alert through its official communication channels. This alert specifically indicated a suspected major service outage affecting Hyperliquid’s Ethereum Virtual Machine implementation. Consequently, the blockchain community began investigating the potential scope and impact of this disruption. HyperEVM represents Hyperliquid’s implementation of the Ethereum Virtual Machine, designed specifically for high-performance decentralized applications. This Layer 2 solution aims to provide faster transactions and lower fees compared to the Ethereum mainnet. Therefore, any service disruption directly affects the user experience and application functionality. The suspected outage potentially impacts transaction processing, smart contract execution, and cross-chain operations. Technical Background and Network Architecture HyperEVM operates as an optimistic rollup solution, bundling multiple transactions off-chain before submitting them to Ethereum. This architecture typically provides significant scalability improvements. However, it also introduces specific failure points that could trigger service disruptions. The network’s consensus mechanism and sequencer operations remain critical components for maintaining continuous service availability. Previous blockchain outages have demonstrated several common causes: Sequencer failures disrupting transaction ordering Bridge contract vulnerabilities affecting asset transfers Node synchronization issues creating network partitions Resource exhaustion from unexpected transaction volumes Historical Context of Blockchain Network Outages Blockchain networks have experienced various service disruptions throughout their development history. For instance, Solana has faced multiple network outages due to resource exhaustion. Similarly, Arbitrum experienced a sequencer failure in 2023 that temporarily halted transactions. These incidents highlight the ongoing challenges in maintaining 100% uptime for decentralized systems. The table below compares recent major blockchain outages: Network Date Duration Primary Cause Solana September 2023 5 hours Resource exhaustion Arbitrum June 2023 2 hours Sequencer failure Polygon March 2023 30 minutes Network upgrade issue Avalanche December 2022 4 hours Validator consensus failure PeckShield’s Monitoring Methodology PeckShield employs sophisticated monitoring systems that track multiple blockchain health indicators. These systems analyze transaction success rates, block production intervals, and node synchronization status. Additionally, they monitor smart contract interactions and cross-chain bridge operations. The security firm’s detection algorithms use machine learning to identify abnormal patterns that may indicate service degradation or complete outages. Potential Impact on Users and Applications The suspected HyperEVM outage potentially affects several user groups and applications. Firstly, decentralized finance protocols relying on HyperEVM for transaction execution may experience failed transactions. Secondly, NFT marketplaces and gaming applications could face interrupted operations. Thirdly, cross-chain asset transfers between HyperEVM and other networks might encounter delays or failures. User funds generally remain secure during such outages due to blockchain’s inherent security properties. However, transaction delays and failed operations can create temporary liquidity issues. Furthermore, arbitrage opportunities and trading strategies may be disrupted. Consequently, the economic impact extends beyond simple service unavailability. Industry Response and Best Practices The blockchain industry has developed specific best practices for handling network outages. These include maintaining multiple RPC endpoints, implementing circuit breakers in smart contracts, and establishing clear communication protocols. Leading projects typically maintain status pages and incident response teams. Moreover, they often provide alternative access methods during partial outages. Security experts recommend several mitigation strategies: Multi-chain deployment for critical applications Graceful degradation features in smart contracts Real-time monitoring with automated alerts Contingency plans for various failure scenarios Technical Analysis of Possible Causes Several technical factors could contribute to a HyperEVM service outage. The network’s sequencer implementation represents a potential single point of failure. Additionally, bridge contracts between HyperEVM and Ethereum mainnet might encounter unexpected conditions. Furthermore, validator node software could contain undiscovered bugs affecting consensus. Network upgrades and parameter changes sometimes introduce instability. Similarly, sudden increases in transaction volume might overwhelm system resources. Moreover, coordinated attacks or exploitation attempts could trigger protective measures that inadvertently cause service disruption. The blockchain’s economic security model relies on proper incentive alignment, which could be temporarily disrupted. Comparative Analysis with Other Layer 2 Solutions HyperEVM competes with numerous other Layer 2 solutions, each with different architectural approaches. Optimistic rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism use similar fraud-proof mechanisms. Meanwhile, zero-knowledge rollups like zkSync and StarkNet employ cryptographic validity proofs. These technical differences create varying failure modes and recovery procedures. Each architecture presents unique advantages and challenges regarding network stability. For example, optimistic rollups typically have shorter withdrawal periods but require challenging periods. Conversely, zero-knowledge rollups provide immediate finality but face computational complexity challenges. Understanding these trade-offs helps contextualize the HyperEVM outage within the broader Layer 2 ecosystem. Regulatory and Compliance Implications Network outages increasingly attract regulatory attention as blockchain adoption grows. Financial authorities monitor service reliability for systems handling significant value. Consequently, projects must maintain transparency about incident response and recovery procedures. Furthermore, they need to demonstrate adequate risk management practices. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation includes specific requirements for service continuity. Similarly, various jurisdictions are developing standards for blockchain infrastructure reliability. These regulatory developments create additional incentives for maintaining robust, resilient networks. Therefore, incident response becomes both a technical and compliance priority. Future Prevention and Improvement Strategies The blockchain industry continues developing improved fault tolerance mechanisms. Decentralized sequencer networks represent one promising approach to reducing single points of failure. Additionally, formal verification of critical smart contracts helps prevent unexpected behavior. Furthermore, improved monitoring and alerting systems enable faster incident detection and response. Research continues on several fronts to enhance network reliability. Cross-chain communication protocols are becoming more robust through standardization efforts. Similarly, node software implementations are incorporating better error handling and recovery features. Moreover, community-driven testing and bug bounty programs help identify vulnerabilities before they cause production outages. Conclusion PeckShield’s report of a suspected major HyperEVM outage highlights the ongoing challenges in maintaining reliable blockchain infrastructure. This incident serves as a reminder that even advanced Layer 2 solutions face operational risks. The blockchain community will closely monitor Hyperliquid’s response and recovery efforts. Ultimately, each outage provides valuable lessons for improving network resilience across the entire ecosystem. The HyperEVM situation demonstrates that infrastructure reliability remains a critical priority for mainstream blockchain adoption. FAQs Q1: What is HyperEVM and how does it relate to Hyperliquid? HyperEVM is Hyperliquid’s implementation of the Ethereum Virtual Machine designed as a Layer 2 scaling solution. It processes transactions off-chain before settling them on Ethereum, providing faster and cheaper transactions while maintaining security through Ethereum’s consensus. Q2: How does PeckShield detect blockchain network outages? PeckShield employs automated monitoring systems that track multiple network health indicators including transaction success rates, block production intervals, node synchronization status, and smart contract functionality. Their systems use machine learning algorithms to identify abnormal patterns indicating potential service disruptions. Q3: Are user funds at risk during a HyperEVM outage? User funds typically remain secure during network outages due to blockchain’s cryptographic security properties. However, access to funds and ability to transact may be temporarily limited until service restoration. The decentralized nature of blockchain ensures that ownership records persist even during infrastructure issues. Q4: How do Layer 2 outages differ from mainnet outages? Layer 2 outages primarily affect transaction processing and smart contract execution on the scaling solution, while the underlying mainnet (Ethereum) continues operating normally. Recovery procedures differ since Layer 2 solutions have their own consensus mechanisms and operational parameters separate from the main chain. Q5: What should users do during a suspected blockchain network outage? Users should avoid submitting transactions during confirmed outages to prevent failed operations and potential gas fee losses. They should monitor official communication channels for status updates and recovery timelines. For critical operations, users might consider alternative networks if their applications support multi-chain deployment. This post HyperEVM Outage Crisis: PeckShield Reports Major Service Disruption on Hyperliquid Network first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

30 Mar 2026, 16:44

Defensive Crypto Picks — Where Smart Money Is Moving in 2026

As market dynamics shift, the focus turns to safer crypto assets poised for steady growth. In 2026, savvy investors are redirecting funds to resilient coins with promising futures. Discover the cryptocurrencies that are capturing attention and why they’re considered strong bets in these uncertain times. Arbitrum (ARB) Eyes Potential Gains Despite Recent Struggles Source: tradingview Arbitrum's current price sits between nine to ten cents, trying to recover from some recent slumps. The coin has seen a slight weekly uptick but is still down majorly over six months. The price is moving below its immediate resistance of a bit over ten cents. If ARB manages to break past this, it could see gains moving up to about eighteen percent higher to its next resistance. However, it also stands close to a support level just above seven cents. With an RSI close to 64, it hints at potential upward momentum. If ARB can maintain its current course, there may be room for optimism. Pi Network Struggles Below Key Resistance Levels Source: tradingview Pi Network's coin price is hovering between seventeen and nineteen cents. It has shown little movement recently, stuck below the key resistance level of twenty-one cents. Over the past week, the price dipped almost eight percent, suggesting a bearish short-term trend. Despite this, the coin has seen a slight growth of around 2.5% over the past month. Its support level sits at sixteen cents, providing a safety net for investors. If market forces push it above the twenty-one-cent mark, it might rise to near twenty-three cents, offering a possible growth of over fifteen percent. However, the current indicators show a lack of strong momentum. TRON (TRX) Eyes On Breakout, Could Surge 10% Source: tradingview TRON (TRX) is trading between 31 and 33 cents. This digital coin has seen a decent rise of over 4% in the past week and an impressive 14% in the past month. It's close to a resistance level at around 33 cents, which might be a hurdle. However, if TRON can climb past this, it might reach the next resistance at about 36 cents. This would mark a substantial increase of nearly 10% from its current upper price. The momentum is in its favor, as traders note the RSI around 61 and positive trends in other market signals, indicating potential for further growth. Conclusion ARB, PI, and TRX have shown stability and promise among cryptocurrencies. These coins attract smart investments due to their strong fundamentals and growth potential. In 2026, the trend indicates a movement towards secure and reliable options. These coins stand out as favored choices for cautious investors. They are poised to offer steady growth and consistent returns. Investors are likely to focus on these cryptocurrencies for their proven resilience. Their strong position in the market makes them attractive for those looking for safer options. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

30 Mar 2026, 10:35

Ethereum Foundation stakes record amount of ETH

The Ethereum Foundation made its biggest ETH staking deposit to date. The shift arrives after years of selling and pressure for the Foundation to put its reserves to good use. The Ethereum Foundation staked $46.2M worth of ETH in a series of transactions, its biggest daily transfer to the Beacon Chain contract. After the transfer, the Foundation still carried 147.47K ETH, holding one of the more significant treasuries. The Ethereum Foundation started staking just as Bitmine wrapped up its staking operations. Currently, 2.7M are pending to enter the Beacon Chain contract, and the waiting time has fallen below 50 days. The Foundation’s end goal is to stake 72K ETH, according to earlier statements by Vitalik Buterin . While selling from the Ethereum Foundation was small and did not directly affect the market, it was considered a sign of ignoring the long-term potential of ETH. Previously, the Foundation allocated some of its funds to DeFi, including Steakhouse lending vaults. The Beacon Contract remains the most conservative and reliable source of yield, while also increasing network security. The Foundation’s move arrived as ETH recovered to $2,054.00, trading with a neutral sentiment. Alongside the Ethereum Foundation, data also shows ETH is flowing out of exchanges and that staking is expanding, indicating whales and long-term holders are ready to hold the token for the long term. Ethereum Foundation creates Ethereum Economic Zone The Ethereum Foundation changed its attitude toward L2 chains. Previously, the chains held strong brands, and each one was a hub for liquidity. The Ethereum Economic Zone aims to blur the boundaries between the L1 mainnet and L2 chains. The Foundation noted rollups were the answer to scaling, lowering transactions on both the Ethereum network and known L2s. However, the Foundation noted liquidity was siloed into each L2 network, with minimal interaction between those ecosystems. L2 chains also spawned their own lists of apps, becoming disconnected from Ethereum. Ethereum Economic Zone rollups will be created for contracts that would otherwise be deployed on the mainnet. With this move, the Ethereum Foundation creates its own scaling infrastructure, without the brands and bridging used for other networks. The move may lower the output of L2 chains and their DeFi apps , which have so far been the main use case for Arbitrum, Base, ZKSync, Optimism, and other prominent L2s. The Ethereum Foundation remains in focus for governance conflict The Ethereum ecosystem is facing another rift based on the supporters of the Milady project. On one side, the Milady supporters claim they can become the online presence of Ethereum and increase its cultural momentum at a time of doubt, so the network can survive in the long run. For others, the Milady supporters are sporting obscure philosophy, with little care for the ETH market performance and the chain’s economic potential. Your bank is using your money. You’re getting the scraps. Watch our free video on becoming your own bank